Analysis of the modern structure of socialist property

As a result of the introduction of self-financing, the structure of public property is moving towards differentiated appropriation in its development. This means that the subjects of socialist appropriation should not be limited only to the state. Ensuring such differentiation in order for each person, labor collectives and the whole society to realize their position as owners is the main direction of restructuring the relations of socialist property, turning it into a truly national property. In this context, it is necessary to rethink Marx's fundamental characteristic of the property of the future socialist society.

Here, the activity of the property object and its specific parameters are again detected.

This applies primarily to the cooperative form of ownership and economy, which under socialism, as it turned out, has deeper foundations than was previously believed. Its necessity is due not only to the low level of socialization of production, but also to the peculiarities of the growth of socialization, the structure of objects about which property relations arise, and the trend of changes in this structure.

The analysis of the structure of socialist property also includes the study of the role and place of appropriation associated with self-employment. To understand the objective necessity of the latter, it is again important to take into account the active role of the object of property in determining its form. The real state of the national economy is such that there are many areas where individual labor activity is effective.

Individual labor activity is not a new phenomenon for our country. Being, in fact, constitutionally recognized, it was, however, not adequately provided for by economic conditions and legal acts. They were scattered in nature and did not cover many types of self-employment that actually took place and were recognized by public opinion. This led to underutilization of the labor creative potential of society, artificially limited individual labor activity.

At the same time, it should be noted that the deployment of such activities generates many new practical and theoretical problems. Thus, the question is often raised: is individual work private in nature? It seems, however, that the question in this form is not formulated precisely. It would seem more correct to ask, firstly, whether individual labor activity can turn into private and whether such a transformation sometimes occurs in practice, and secondly, whether society can prevent such a transformation for the bulk of those engaged in this activity. We believe that these questions should be answered in the affirmative.

Of course, in practice, you can find many examples when people engaged in self-employment, in conditions of scarcity, inflate prices and receive unearned income. However, this does not mean that the State is unable to prevent such phenomena. On the contrary, in this case, it has a fairly powerful arsenal of tools. And the issue here should not be limited to tax policy. f8bet